Increases in diastolic [Ca<sup>2+</sup>] can contribute to positive inotropy in guinea pig ventricular myocytes in the absence of changes in amplitudes of Ca<sup>2+</sup>transients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increases in contraction amplitude following rest or in elevated extracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)]) have been attributed to increased sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) stores and/or increased trigger Ca(2+). However, either manipulation also may elevate diastolic [Ca(2+)]. The objective of this study was to determine whether elevation of diastolic [Ca(2+)] could contribute to positive inotropy in isolated ventricular myocytes. Voltage-clamp experiments were conducted with high-resistance microelectrodes in isolated myocytes at 37 degrees C. Intracellular free [Ca(2+)] was measured with fura-2, and cell shortening was measured with an edge detector. SR Ca(2+) stores were assessed with 10 mM caffeine (0 mM Na(+), 0 mM Ca(2+)). Following a period of rest, cells were activated with trains of pulses, which generated contractions of increasing amplitude, called positive staircases. Positive staircases were accompanied by increasing diastolic [Ca(2+)] but no change in Ca(2+) transient amplitudes. When extracellular [Ca(2+)] was elevated from 2.0 to 5.0 mM, resting intracellular [Ca(2+)] increased and resting cell length decreased. Amplitudes of contractions and L-type Ca(2+) current increased in elevated extracellular [Ca(2+)], although SR Ca(2+) stores, assessed by rapid application of caffeine, did not increase. Although Ca(2+) transient amplitude did not increase in 5.0 mM extracellular [Ca(2+)], diastolic [Ca(2+)] continued to increase with increasing extracellular [Ca(2+)]. These data suggest that increased diastolic [Ca(2+)] contributes to positive inotropy following rest or with increasing extracellular [Ca(2+)] in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".