MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060797331 · doi:10.1103/physreve.68.051903

Stability and bifurcation in an integral-delay model of cardiac reentry including spatial coupling in repolarization

2003· article· en· W2060797331 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Comtois, Alain Vinet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReentryCoupling (piping)Hopf bifurcationBifurcationPhysicsRepolarizationStability (learning theory)Mathematical analysisDispersion relationAction (physics)MathematicsDispersion (optics)MechanicsControl theory (sociology)Quantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceNonlinear systemComputer scienceElectrophysiologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the bifurcation analysis of a revised version of the integral-delay model [Courtemanche et al., Siam J. Appl. Math. 56, 119 (1996)] of reentry in a one-dimensional ring that includes a spatial coupling in the calculation of the action potential duration. This coupling is meant to reproduce the modulation of repolarization by the diffusive current flowing through the intercellular resistance. We show that coupling modifies the criterion for the stability of the period-1 solution, which is no longer uniquely related to the action potential restitution curve, but depends also on the degree of coupling between cells and on the dispersion relation of the velocity. Coupling also changes the scenario from an infinite-dimension Hopf bifurcation to a finite sequence of Hopf bifurcations that take place at different ring lengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207