Exact Solutions for Free Vibrations and Buckling of Double Tapered Columns With Elastic Foundation and Tip Mass
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study aims at the free vibration analysis of double tapered columns. Foundation is assumed to be elastic and the effects of self-weight and tip mass with significant moment of inertia are considered. The governing equation of motion is obtained using the Hamilton principle, based on both the Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models. Applying the power series method of Frobenius, the base solutions of the governing equations are obtained in the form of a power series via general recursive relations. Applying the boundary conditions, the natural frequencies of the beam/column are obtained using both models. The obtained results are compared with literature and a very good agreement is achieved. Subsequently, comprehensive studies are performed to provide an insight into the variation of the natural frequencies and instability conditions of the beam with respect to the tip mass, self-weight, taper ratio, slenderness, and foundation stiffness and eventually some general conclusions are drawn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it