MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060816581 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2006.382132

Wavelet-Based Video Denoising Using Gauss-Hermite Density Function

2006· article· en· W2060816581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletVideo denoisingNoise reductionMathematicsProbability density functionArtificial intelligenceEstimatorPeak signal-to-noise ratioAlgorithmWavelet transformComputer scienceMean squared errorVideo trackingStatisticsVideo processingMultiview Video Coding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new wavelet-domain video denoising scheme is proposed that exploits the Gauss-Hermite probability density function (p.d.f.) for spatial filtering of the noisy frame wavelet coefficients. It is observed that the proposed p.d.f. matches the empirical one very well as compared to other conventional density functions such as the generalized Gaussian and Bessel K-form densities. The proposed p.d.f. is used in an approximate minimum mean square error estimator for spatial filtering. Temporal filtering of a video sequence is performed by a motion detector and recursive time-averaging. Simulation results on standard video sequences show improved performance both in visual quality and in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio as compared to other recent video denoising methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it