MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060843474 · doi:10.1143/jjap.45.4143

A New System of Low Temperature Sintering ZnO–SiO<sub>2</sub> Dielectric Ceramics

2006· article· en· W2060843474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSinteringCeramicMaterials scienceDielectricComposite numberMicrowaveComposite materialDielectric lossOptoelectronicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new ZnO–SiO2 microwave dielectric ceramic system with Li2CO3 and Bi2O3 composite additives was studied. It was difficult to acquire dense ceramics at 1380 °C without sintering aids using the ZnO–SiO2 system. With 5 wt % Li2CO3 and 4 wt % Bi2O3 composite addition, the ZnO–SiO2 system can be sintered well at approximately 900 °C. The dielectric constant of ZnO–SiO2 system decreased with increasing SiO2 content and Q×f value acquired a maximum at a certain SiO2 content. The samples of ZnO–0.6SiO2 with Li2CO3 and Bi2O3 addition sintered at 910 °C for 2 h showed excellent properties such as εr=6.65, Q×f=33,000 GHz (at 11 GHz), and τf=-70 ppm/°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it