Real-Time Optimization of Batch Processes by Tracking the Necessary Conditions of Optimality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of measurements to compensate for the effect of uncertainty has recently gained attention in the context of real-time optimization of dynamic systems. The commonly used approach consists of updating a process model and performing numerical optimization using the refined model. In contrast, this paper presents a two-level approach that does not require repeating the optimization: At the upper level, the constraints that are active in the optimal solution are identified from optimization of a nominal process model; at the lower level, feedback control is used to enforce the necessary conditions of optimality, i.e., meet the identified active constraints and push selected gradients to zero. A key feature of this self-optimizing control scheme is the use of an input parametrization that is tailored to the identified active constraints. Another feature that is specific to batch processes is the possibility to meet the control objectives either online or on a run-to-run basis. The self-optimizing control approach is illustrated on a semibatch reactor example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it