MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060887411 · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000000247

Cerebellum-specific 18F-FDG PET analysis for the detection of subregional glucose metabolism changes in spinocerebellar ataxia

2014· article· en· W2060887411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jungsu S. Oh, Minyoung Oh, Sun Ju Chung, Jae Seung Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinocerebellar ataxiaSpatial normalizationCerebellumPet imagingNormalization (sociology)NeuroscienceNuclear medicineCerebellar cortexAtaxiaPositron emission tomographyMedicineBiologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cerebellum (CB) consists of complex anatomical and functional subregions. To better investigate the complicated functional anatomy, a detailed subregional analysis and/or a precise spatial normalization of the fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET imaging data are essential. Here, the 28 MRIcron CB volumes of interests (VOIs) template merged into eight cerebellar subregional VOIs (bilateral anterior, superior, and inferior posterior lobes of the CB cortex, and the superior and inferior vermis) on mean F-FDG PET templates. We also developed a new spatial normalization method using a study-specific and CB-specific template (CBSST) to better localize the VOIs and to minimize interparticipant differences for the locations of whole and subregional CB VOIs, as well as to increase the accuracy of the subregional mean F-FDG uptake. Using VOIs of individual F-FDG PET images normalized to the F-FDG template, we analyzed subregional cerebellar glucose metabolism in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia, a representative disease involving the spinocerebellum, and compared them with age-matched and sex-matched healthy normal controls. We achieved significant improvement over the Montreal Neurological Institute template in spatial normalization accuracy using our CBSST approach for CB VOI location agreement increases (79 vs. 90%) and VOI uptake error decreases in many CB subregions. We also found significant decreases in the anterior/posterior ratio of F-FDG uptake in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (0.45) compared with those in normal controls (0.73) only using our CBSST approach. Therefore, we established an accurate CB subregional VOI analysis framework, and this may be useful for understanding and differentiating many of the cerebellar ataxia diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207