Heart Rate Variability Response to Standing in Men and Women Receiving <scp>d</scp> , <scp>l</scp> -Sotalol Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV), a quantitative marker of autonomic control of heart rate (HR), declines in men and women following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Although d,l-sotalol is prescribed following CABG surgery primarily for its antiarrhythmic effect, its effects on HRV have not been reported; the β-adrenergic antagonist effect of d,l-sotalol may attenuate sympathetically mediated HR and blood pressure (BP) responses to standing, resulting in postural hypotension. In this study, the HRV response to standing 4 days following CABG surgery in men and women prescribed d,l-sotalol was measured to examine the influence of d,l-sotalol on previously reported HRV responses, taking age and gender into consideration. Participants included 28 men and 10 women who completed testing in supine and standing postures; all had received low-dose d,l-sotalol daily since the first postoperative day. Data included continuous electrocardiograph recording of R-R interval for 10 min in each posture. Participants showed significant effects of standing on the autonomic modulation of HR, as seen by a decrease in parasympathetic indices and R-R interval and an increase in BP. In men, standing decreased parasympathetic modulation and increased the sympathetic nervous system indicator, but previously reported age effects were not seen. In women, standing decreased low frequency power and R-R interval and increased BP, with older women having a smaller increase in BP, suggesting an attenuated response. The differential autonomic nervous system modulation of HR as a function of gender and age after CABG surgery may be attenuated by d,l-sotalol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".