Borohydride Electro-Oxidation on Gold Investigated by Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quartz crystal microbalance technique coupled with cyclic voltammetry (referred to as electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM)) was employed to study the oxidation of BH 4 − on Au in alkaline media (0.1 M and 2 M NaOH, respectively) using a newly designed vertical cell to minimize the interference by evolved H 2 . The electrode potential was scanned between −0.7 and 0.7 V vs. SHE with scan rates in the range of 0.01 V s −1 and 1 V s −1 . The relative mass changes of the Au resonator-electrode were interpreted in combination with density functional theory (DFT) modeling and pertinent experimental results from the literature. The potential scan rate dependent mass change profiles revealed: i) weak adsorption of BH 4 − below −0.2 V leading to high anodic overpotential, ii) accumulation of reaction intermediates on the surface between approximately −0.2 V to 0.3 V (scan rate dependent), and iii) Au surface hydroxide and oxide assisted oxidation of BH 4 − and possibly of other active species present such as BH 3 OH − formed by hydrolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".