Thermodynamic Investigation of Asphaltene Precipitation during Primary Oil Production: Laboratory and Smart Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asphaltene precipitation (AP) is recognized as a complicated occurrence that results in weakening reservoir characteristics and subsequent considerable decline in oil production rate. Asphaltene instability occurs due to variations in thermodynamic properties such pressure, temperature, and mixture composition. AP prediction is an important design factor in implementation of any enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process. In this study, experiments were conducted using some light oil samples to measure important phase behavior properties such as the bubble point pressure (BPP) and the amount of precipitated asphaltenes. A thermodynamics model was also developed to determine equilibrium compositions of the oil samples, considering AP. Then, potential application of a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) model, optimized by the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), was proposed to estimate BPP and the amount of AP. Comparison between the ICA-ANN predictions and the experimental data shows that the average absolute error between data originated from these two different approaches is less than 5%. In addition, it was found that temperature and pressure have the greatest impacts on AP during natural depletion. Employing laboratory PVT data, the thermodynamics framework resulted in construction of an asphaltene precipitation envelope. This study implies that utilization of an appropriate PVT model along with the ICA-ANN approach in the investigation of AP leads to more reliable predictions compared to the conventional ANN and also a scaling model. The outcomes of this study appear to be useful in the design stage of more-efficient EOR processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".