Penile nerve block at the base of penis in combination with intravenous ketamin plus midazolam versus general anaesthesia(GA) in children undergoing circumcision for post operative pain management in the Eastern Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adequate post operative analgesia in children provides satisfactory psychological objective of this study was to compare the post operative analgesia requirement and child satisfaction between two groups, general anaesthesia(GA) alone and GA in combination with penile nerve block. This prospective randomized study was conducted in 50 children aged 6 to 14 years, who underwent circumcision. The boys were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (n = 25) received GA with Single shot ketamin 2mg/kg IV plus midazolam 0.1 mg/kg and dorsal penile nerve block at the base of penis prior to circumcision with and Group B (n = 25) received GA with ketamine 2mg/kg IV plus midazolam 0.1 mg/kg plus halothane by laryngeal mask. Severity of pain was assessed quantitatively by children’s hospital eastern Ontario pain scale (CHEOPS). The pain intensity was assessed at one hour A1 in group A and B1 for group B and at two hour A2 for group A and B2 for group B during postoperatively period for two hours. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS method. The post operative analgesia was satisfactory with CHEOPS score 6 or <6 in group A 1. In group A 2 twenty two out of twenty five cases had CHEOPS score <6.Where as in group B1 and B2 it was > 6 .Which was statistically 100% significant. In conclusion, combined penile nerve block in combination with intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is the satisfactory method of Post operative pain management in children undergoing circumcision. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v4i1.10846 Journal of Chitwan Medical College 2014; 4(1): 33-36
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".