MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060969197 · doi:10.1029/2008gl034456

Annual period temperature and salinity signals of surface waters in Prince William Sound, Alaska

2008· article· en· W2060969197 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen R. Okkonen, Claude Bélanger

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalinityPeriod (music)OceanographyClimatologyEnvironmental scienceTemperature salinity diagramsSound (geography)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperature and salinity measurements acquired during thermosalinograph surveys conducted throughout Prince William Sound (PWS) between March 2006 and January 2008 are used to identify annual period temperature and salinity signals of surface waters. Mean states and annual period changes in oceanic conditions throughout PWS reflect proximity to glaciated watersheds. Mean temperatures are coolest in northern and western PWS and warmest in southeastern PWS. Annual period temperature amplitude is greatest in western PWS. Mean salinities are lowest in northern and western PWS and highest in central and southeastern PWS. Annual period salinity amplitude is greatest in northern and western PWS. These results represent the most spatially comprehensive descriptions to date of annual period temperature and salinity signals in PWS. The results are applicable as benchmarks for validation of numerical PWS circulation models and as a decision support tool for the use of dispersants in the event of an oil spill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207