Increasing Expression of an Anti-Picloram Single-Chain Variable Fragment (ScFv) Antibody and Resistance to Picloram in Transgenic Tobacco (<i>Nicotiana tabacum</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Systematic research involving four chimeric gene constructions designed to express the same anti-picloram single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody is described. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation produced at least 25 transgenic tobacco plants with each of these, and the number of T-DNA loci in each plant was determined using kanamycin-resistance segregation assays. The relative amounts of active and total scFv in each plant were evaluated using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot technologies, respectively. No significant differences in scFv activity were found among the four groups of single-locus plants, although the 35S/M construct was found to produce significantly more total anti-picloram scFv than the other three constructs. A dose-response bioassay involving T(1) seedlings from several of the highest expressers of active scFv demonstrated resistance to a constant exposure of picloram at 5 x 10(-)(8) M. Other approaches for increasing antibody-based herbicide resistance are discussed, as further improvements are needed before practical application of this technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".