MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061020867 · doi:10.1515/htmp-2012-0132

Thermodynamic Database of P <sub>2</sub> O <sub>5</sub> -containing Oxide Systems for the Dephosphorization Process in Steelmaking

2013· article· en· W2061020867 on OpenAlexafffund
In‐Ho Jung, Pierre Hudon, Wan‐Yi Kim, Marie‐Aline Van Ende, M. Shahidur Rahman, Gabriel Garcia Curiel

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Temperature Materials and Processes · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJFE Steel CorporationTata Steel
KeywordsOxideTernary operationMaterials scienceSteelmakingTernary numeral systemCALPHADThermodynamicsPhase diagramSlag (welding)Phase (matter)MetallurgyChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Na 2 O-MgO-CaO-FeO-Fe 2 O 3 -Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 -P 2 O 5 system is a basic oxide system for the Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) process as well as the hot metal dephosphorization process. Numerous experimental investigations on this oxide system are being carried out to find out an advanced process route for P removal from molten iron. In spite of their industrial importance, however, phase equilibria in oxide systems containing P 2 O 5 have not been well investigated due to the complexity of their chemistry. No systematic thermodynamic modeling of these systems has been conducted to date, either. In order to meet the strong demands of steelmaking and other industries, new systematic thermodynamic modeling of the P 2 O 5 -containing oxide systems (Na 2 O-MgO-CaO-FeO-Fe 2 O 3 -Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 -P 2 O 5 ) and key phase diagram experiments have been carried out over the past years. In the present study, the results of the thermodynamic modeling of unary, binary and ternary P 2 O 5 -containing systems and the applications of the thermodynamic database to the dephosphorization by multi-component slag in BOF process are presented in comparison with experimental data. All thermodynamic calculations were performed using FactSage thermodynamic software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigh Temperature Materials and ProcessesSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207