MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061038353 · doi:10.5539/cis.v7n4p21

Geographic Information System for Detecting Spatial Connectivity Brown Planthopper Endemic Areas Using a Combination of Triple Exponential Smoothing - Getis Ord

2014· article· en· W2061038353 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sri Yulianto J. P., Nugraheni Widyawati, D. H. Kristoko, Bistok Hasiholan S.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential smoothingComputer scienceClass (philosophy)Geographic information systemComponent (thermodynamics)Spatial analysisSmoothingWarning systemData miningPreprocessorData scienceCartographyArtificial intelligenceGeographyRemote sensingComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to develop a GIS application to detect the possible formation of brown planthoppers (BPH) (Nilaparvata lugens.Stal) endemic areas based on spatial trend, hierarchical effects and risks areas caused of spatial connectivity in a particular area. The study was conducted through five stages: (1) the collection and preprocessing of research data, (2) database development, (3) the creation of the component class Exponential Smoothing, Weight Metrics and Getis Ord, (4) development of a Early Warning class and GIS applications, and (5) information visualization in the form of graphs, maps and tables. The results show that the software component in this study; the class prediction engine; Getis Ord class and class early detection function optimally generate predictive, endemic regions and early warning information on the period ahead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicStatistical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207