MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Marginalized populations and property markets: analyzing experiences in Brazil and Canada

2012· article· en· W206104017 on OpenAlex
Ian Skelton, Vera Cristina Ribeiro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo examina tentativas de usar o processo de transformação do mercado por meio do qual a população marginalizada ganha acesso à terra e à habitação em três diferentes situações: favelas no Rio de Janeiro, terras indígenas no Canadá, e comunidades pobres em cidades no interior do Canadá. O estudo começa com a ligação da racionalização destas diferentes iniciativas políticas com o neoliberalismo. Então, o esboço destas políticas e as intervenções planejadas perseguem esta idéia, mostrando como as intervenções foram discutidas na literatura e nos documentos de política, relatando resultados chave ou antecipando-os. Este artigo discute isso com o propósito de proporcionar o florescimento da diversidade. Planejadores deveriam construir alternativas para a orientação do mercado contemporâneo e estar atentos para um número recente de propostas relacionadas a esta tarefa. Résumé: Cet article examine comment les tentatives pour utiliser les marchés transforment les processus par lesquels des peuples marginalisés accèdent à des terrains et au logement dans trois contextes différents: les favelas de Rio de Janeiro, les terres autochtones du Canada et les quartiers pauvres des centres-villes du Canada. En premier lieu, un lien est fait entre la justification de ces politiques et le néo-libéralisme. Ensuite, les politiques et les interventions de planification qui conforment à ces idées sont décrites pour montrer comment ces interventions sont présentées dans la littérature et dans les documents de politique, et dans les rapports de resultants-clés ou attendus. Cet article soutient que pour permettre une plus grande diversité, les planificateurs devraient trouver d’autres solutions à l’orientation contemporaine des marchés et révèle plusieurs propositions pour faciliter cette tâche.Mots-clés: centre-ville; favelas; lodgement; marché fiduciaire; terrain; peuples marginalises.Abstract: This paper examines attempts to use markets transform the processes through which marginalized populations gain access to land and housing in three different settings: favelas in Rio de Janeiro; indigenous lands in Canada; and poor neighbourhoods in Canadian inner cities. It begins by linking the rationalization of these different policy initiatives to neoliberalism. Then it outlines policy and planning interventions pursuant to these ideas, showing how the interventions have been discussed in the literature and in policy documents, and reporting key results or anticipated outcomes. The paper argues that in order to enable diversity to flourish, planners should build alternatives to the contemporary market orientation and draws attention to a number of recent proposals for this task.Keywords: land and housing policies; neoliberalism and marginalized populations; diversity; contemporary property markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it