Solution Properties of a Thermosensitive Triblock Copolymer of <i>N</i>-Alkyl Substituted Acrylamides
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ABC triblock copolymer PnPA(124)-b-PiPA80-b-PEMA(44) was synthesized by a sequential three-step reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization of N-n-propylacrylamide (nPA), N-isopropylacrylamide (iPA), and N,N-ethylmethylacrylamide (EMA). The thermoresponsive characteristics of the aqueous solution of the triblock copolymer have been studied in comparison with the corresponding mono- and diblocks by UV-visible and NMR spectroscopies, differential scanning calorimetry, and dynamic light scattering. The hydrophilicity of the blocks influences each other, rendering each block a phase transition temperature different from that of the corresponding homopolymers. The cloud points of the three steps of the phase separations were determined to be 31.5, 46.8, and 57.6 degrees C for steps one to three, respectively, while heating the aqueous solution of the triblock copolymer. At approximately 31 degrees C, the PnPA block started to dehydrate, causing the formation of micelles with the PnPA block as the core, dehydrated PiPA as the shell, and water-soluble PEMA block as the corona. The collapse of the dehydrated PiPA block was restricted by the shielding and stretching effect of the neighboring soluble PEMA block, and the resultant micelles had a high water content in their hydrodynamic volume. Continued increase in temperature to approximately 47 degrees C caused further dehydration of the micelles, and the final collapse of the third block of PEMA at approximately 58 degrees C led to further aggregation of the micelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it