Celebrating the Suppression of the North-West Resistance of 1885: The Toronto Press and the Militia Volunteers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article examine la couverture que les journaux et la presse illustrée de Toronto ont faite du soutien accordé par la ville à la mobilisation de soldats citoyens canadiens pour réprimer la résistance au Nord-Ouest en 1885. L’auteur postule que la presse torontoise a construit de façon rhétorique et a même directement favorisé la vaste occupation publique des rues de la ville au départ des jeunes hommes pour le Nord-Ouest et au retour des volontaires. La presse a diffusé le récit de la vigoureuse suppression des rebelles et du rétablissement de la loi et de l’ordre, en plus de vanter l’admiration publique du patriotisme, de l’ordre, de la discipline et du devoir exhibés par les soldats canadiens à temps partiel. Or, en même temps, elle en a fait l’histoire du mythe milicien en action, du pouvoir de la population à l’appui de l’État et de l’armée, ainsi que de la force et de la détermination des citoyens ordinaires prompts à porter l’uniforme des volontaires de la milice et à risquer leur vie pour défendre le pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".