MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W206107388

Jasper's Day

2003· article· en· W206107388 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lianna Titcombe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian veterinary journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorrowGriefHonestyFeelingPsychologyPsychoanalysisNatural (archaeology)Social psychologyHistoryPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jasper's Day is a hard-covered, illustrated children's book about how a young boy copes with the loss of his dog. The fact that this book is being reviewed in The Canadian Veterinary Journal shows a growing commitment by the veterinary profession to recognize the intense feelings of pain and sorrow resulting from the death of a pet. For children, the loss of a companion animal is often their first experience with death. If it is not handled with comfort, understanding, and honesty, it may negatively affect how that child deals with loss, far into adulthood. It has been said that if you are old enough to love, you are old enough to grieve. Children should be permitted, even encouraged, to grieve the loss of a treasured pet in their own way and in their own time. They should be included in family discussions regarding euthanasia and should be allowed to be present at the final visit to the veterinarian, if they wish. Marjorie Blain Parker does a wonderful job in helping children (and adults) to understand that grieving the loss of a beloved pet is a natural, necessary process. Jasper's family mourns his passing in a beautiful, touching way by dedicating the last day of his life to the dog, sharing in all his favorite activities, and saying good-bye to family and friends. The parents support their child's idea for “Jasper's day” and are honest and compassionate with their son. They explain how Jasper is very old and in pain, and how the veterinarian will give him a “shot” to end his life. The author should be commended for going so far as to say, “Jasper will be dead”; it is important to use realistic terms with children, so they can fully understand the finality of the act of euthanasia. I think the only place where the story falls short is when the father goes off alone to the veterinarian with Jasper. A child of Riley's age should have at least been asked if he wanted to be with his dog to comfort him during his final moments. However, the father does bring Jasper's body back home for a peaceful burial service to bring closure to his death. The words of this story are brought to life by wonderful illustrations that add feelings of warmth and affection. In fact, my favorite part of the book is the last page, which is filled with pictures that the little boy puts in a scrapbook to celebrate Jasper's life. I highly recommend this book, especially to parents who wish to help their children cope with the loss of a pet in a healthy, loving way. Veterinarians may suggest the book to their clients prior to the euthanasia of the family dog. It may also be useful to psychologists, grief counsellors, and pet loss support group facilitators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian veterinary journalSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207