Artificially Lipid-anchored Proteins Can Elicit Clustering-induced Intracellular Signaling Events in Jurkat T-Lymphocytes Independent of Lipid Raft Association
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have incorporated artificial lipid-anchored streptavidin conjugates with fully saturated or polyunsaturated lipid anchors into the plasma membranes of Jurkat T-lymphocytes to assess previous conclusions that the activation of signaling processes induced in these cells by clustering of endogenous glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins or ganglioside GM1 depends specifically on the association of these membrane components with lipid rafts. Lipid-anchored streptavidin conjugates could be incorporated into Jurkat or other mammalian cell surfaces by inserting biotinylated phosphatidylethanolamine-polyethyleneglycols (PE-PEGs) and subsequently binding streptavidin to the cell-incorporated PE-PEGs. Saturated dipalmitoyl-PE-PEG-streptavidin conjugates prepared in this manner partitioned substantially into the detergent-insoluble membrane fraction isolated from Jurkat or fibroblast cells, whereas polyunsaturated dilinoleoyl-PE-PEG-anchored conjugates were wholly excluded from this fraction, consistent with the differences in the affinities of the two types of lipid anchors for liquid-ordered membrane domains. Remarkably, however, antibody-mediated cross-linking of either dipalmitoyl- or dilinoleoyl-PE-PEG-anchored streptavidin conjugates in Jurkat cells induced elevation of cytoplasmic calcium levels and tyrosine phosphorylation of the scaf-folding protein linker of T-cell activation in a manner similar to that observed upon cross-linking of endogenous CD59 or ganglioside GM1. The amplitude of the cross-linking-stimulated elevation of cytoplasmic calcium moreover showed an essentially identical dependence on the level of incorporated streptavidin conjugate for either type of lipid anchor. Confocal fluorescence microscopy revealed that PE-PEG-streptavidin conjugates with saturated versus polyunsaturated anchors showed very similar surface distributions vis à vis GM1 or CD59 under conditions where one or both species were cross-linked. These results indicate that cross-linking of diverse proteins anchored only to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane can induce activation of Jurkat T-cell-signaling responses, but they appear to contradict previous suggestions that this phenomenon rests specifically on the association of such species with lipid rafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".