MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061090048 · doi:10.7202/018171ar

Ipséité et passivité : le montage narratif du soi (Paul Ricoeur, Wilhelm Schapp et Antonin Artaud)

2008· article· fr· W2061090048 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sophie-Jan Arrien

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le phénomène de la vie — toujours mienne ou tienne — se donne à voir et à comprendre dans sa cohésion et son identité propre à partir d’un montage narratif. C’est l’hypothèse qu’explore cet article en tâchant de déterminer si ce montage narratif renvoie à un « coup monté », comme le suggère Artaud, ou s’il s’agit, selon l’analyse très différente de Ricoeur, d’une intrigue dans laquelle un personnage, intriqué dans ses propres expériences, lutte contre l’éparpillement de soi, ou encore, comme chez Schapp, si chacun est empêtré dans ses histoires et dans celles des autres, sans pouvoir s’atteindre autrement qu’à travers ces empêtrements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaval théologique et philosophiqueSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207