A Comparison Between Two Models That Predict the Elastic-Plastic Behavior of Particulate Metal Matrix Composites Under Multiaxial Fatigue Type Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is an effort to first modify two cyclic plasticity models developed for homogeneous metals to address the heterogeneous nature of particulate metal matrix composites (PMMCs), and subsequently to evaluate the resulting relations both theoretically and experimentally. Specifically, using the original Mro´z model and the endochronic theory of plasticity as their bases, two sets of elastic-plastic constitutive relations are identified. These sets of relations account for the interaction in stress fields between adjacent particles in PMMCs. The behavior predicted by each model is compared with experimental results obtained from a series of uniaxial and biaxial (tension-torsion) tests performed on circular specimens made of the 6061/Al2O3/20p-T6 PMMCs with 20% volume fraction of particles. The materials are tested for a variety of applied monotonic and cyclic loading paths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".