MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061121461 · doi:10.1039/b009986o

A quartz crystal resonant sensor (QCRS) study of HSA–drug interactions

2001· article· en· W2061121461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHuman serum albuminBovine serum albuminResonance (particle physics)Serum albuminLigand (biochemistry)QuartzYield (engineering)Plasma protein bindingBinding siteCrystal (programming language)AlbuminChromatographyBiochemistryReceptorMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human serum albumin (HSA) was immobilised on the gold surface of a quartz crystal resonance sensor (QCRS) and exposed to warfarin and diazepam. Distinct decreases in frequency of differing magnitudes were observed upon exposure of the protein to each of the compounds suggesting strongly that a ligand interaction was occurring. Moreover, as sequential exposure in any order was observed to yield distinct repeatable frequency decreases for the ligands indicated, screening for site specific binding may be possible. Identically immobilised bovine serum albumin (BSA) gave no response to either compound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it