MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061141313 · doi:10.1002/anie.200504432

Catalytic Enantioselective and Catalyst‐Controlled Diastereofacial‐Selective Additions of Allyl‐ and Crotylboronates to Aldehydes Using Chiral Brønsted Acids

2006· article· en· W2061141313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnantioselective synthesisCatalysisScope (computer science)Substrate (aquarium)ChemistryBrønsted–Lowry acid–base theoryIdeal (ethics)Organic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryDiolComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Towards the ideal: A chiral diol–SnCl4 complex is applied to the allylboration of aldehydes (see scheme). This approach highlights the use of chiral Brønsted acid catalysis in the development of an ideal method for the allylation of aldehydes which would display high diastereo- and enantioselectivity, wide substrate scope, and high practicality (ease of use, low cost, and low environmental impact).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it