Minería y glaciares rocosos: impactos ambientales, antecedentes políticos y legales, y perspectivas futuras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El inters cientfi co y poltico en los glaciares rocosos andinos ha aumentado fuertemente en los ltimos aos debido al creciente reconocimiento de su importancia hidrolgica y las recientes intervenciones mineras en ellos. Se presenta un resumen de los conocimientos cientfi cos y el marco poltico-legal de las intervenciones pasadas y actuales en glaciares rocosos en Chile y, en forma preliminar, en Argentina y Per. En estos pases, 26 faenas mineras han afectado glaciares rocosos o podran posiblemente intervenirlos en el futuro. Hasta la fecha, el rea afectada de glaciares rocosos en Chile es de aproximadamente 3,3 km 2 . Se recomienda ampliar el actual debate sobre intervenciones en glaciares rocosos, basado en la actualidad principalmente en argumentos hidrolgicos, para tomar en cuenta peligros ambientales en el largo plazo -como la posible inestabilidad de glaciares rocosos con depsitos mineros-como tambin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".