Contribution of Individual Amino Acids to the 5S RNA Binding Activity of the <i>Xenopus</i> Zinc Finger Protein p43
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xenopus zinc finger protein p43 binds to 5S RNA in immature oocytes to form a 42S ribonucleoprotein storage particle. To determine the role of individual zinc fingers of the protein in this RNA binding activity, a series of deletion and substitution mutants of p43 were constructed. The effects of the various mutations on the RNA binding activity of p43 were determined using a quantitative equilibrium binding assay. The results indicate that zinc fingers 1 and 4 of p43 are essential for the binding of the protein to 5S RNA. In the case of finger 1, four amino acids key to RNA binding are found on the same face of the alpha-helix, while in the case of finger 4, two key residues are clustered at the start of the alpha-helix. The similarities and differences in the mechanisms by which fingers 1 and 4 of p43 interact with 5S RNA are compared to the interaction of the zinc fingers of Xenopus transcription factor IIIA with 5S RNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".