MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061211424 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v2n1p60

“Boys Remain Prestigious, Girls Become Prostitutes”: Socio-Cultural Context of Relationships and Sex among Young People in Nepal

2010· article· en· W2061211424 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pramod Regmi, Padam Simkhada, Edwin van Teijlingen

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of the West of EnglandUniversity of Aberdeen
KeywordsContext (archaeology)CuriosityReproductive healthUnemploymentFocus groupPsychologyFace (sociological concept)Developing countryGender studiesSociologyDemographyPopulationSocial psychologyEconomic growthGeographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the key characteristics of many developing countries compared to more developed countries is that theirpopulation is relatively young, and a proportion of those young people are becoming sexually active each year.The last two decades has seen a growing concern worldwide of the spread of HIV/AIDS, but, of course, youngpeople face a range of socio-economic, cultural, psychological and sexual health-related problems at that time oftheir life. Very little research has been conducted in this area into Nepalese young people’s problems. Ourqualitative study explores key problems faced by Nepalese youths with particular emphasis on sexual andreproductive health issues. The findings of ten focus group discussions with a total of 75 participants and 31in-depth individual interviews indicated that many young people of Nepal face a range socio-economic,psychological, sexual and reproductive health-related problems. Unemployment, less opportunity for sex andentertainment, stress, curiosity, communication gap and poor sex education and sexual health services werefrequently reported problems. In addition there was a gender difference around sex with young women (girls)having fewer opportunities and less freedom than young men (boys). In order improve young people’s sexualhealth, more attention needs to be given to rigorous research and the design and implementation of appropriateinterventions. Young people’s ability to make informed choices about their own health and risk behaviour shouldbe enhanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health ScienceSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207