MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061212280 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790209

Fuzzy multi‐model based adaptive predictive control and its application to thermoplastic injection molding

2001· article· en· W2061212280 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mingzhong Li, Yi Yang, Furong Gao, Fuli Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Representation (politics)Computer scienceFuzzy control systemFuzzy ruleInterval (graph theory)Nonlinear systemRange (aeronautics)Mathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many chemical processes are inherently nonlinear. A single linear model is ineffective for these processes. Several local linear models may be developed for different operating conditions. A combination of these local models, through a fuzzy logic representation, results in an overall model for a wider operation range. In this paper, on‐line improvements and a fuzzy multi‐model have been proposed for predictive control implementation. Firstly, assuming that the premises of the fuzzy rules keep their original structures, the linear parameters in the rule consequents are on‐line updated by a weighted recursive least squares algorithm at each sample interval. Secondly, a batch learning algorithm is proposed to tune the fuzzy rule premises using a competitive learning algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed improvements is demonstrated with experimental applications to the filling velocity control of thermoplastic injection molding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207