MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061225459 · doi:10.1002/mop.26709

Analytical solution for the design of planar electromagnetic bandgap structures with spurious‐free frequency response

2012· article· en· W2061225459 on OpenAlexaff
Israel Arnedo, M. Chudzik, Joshua D. Schwartz, Iván Arregui, Aintzane Lujambio, Fernando Teberio, D. Benito, M. A. G. Laso, David V. Plant, José Azaña, T. Lopetegi

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopbandSpurious relationshipMicrowaveBroadbandHarmonicsPlanarElectronic engineeringPort (circuit theory)Frequency bandEngineeringElectromagnetic simulationElectrical engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceBand-pass filterTelecommunicationsVoltageAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, an analytical solution is obtained for the design of electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures that feature a single stopband without the spurious rejected bands present in the conventional EBG devices at the harmonics of the design frequency.The proposed technique is applied for the design of microwave filters intended for broadband applications, where closed formulas are found both in two‐port lines and in four‐port coupled lines obtaining very good results. The implementation of the EBG structure in coupled lines allows for the redirection of the reflected signal to the coupled port producing a device with input port matched at all frequencies. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 54:956–960, 2012; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.26709

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207