MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061257316 · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1080540

Activated Protein C: An Emerging Therapeutic Agent in the Prevention of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

2008· review· en· W2061257316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIschemiaReperfusion injuryInflammationThrombosisSurgeryProtein CVascular permeabilityImmunologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free flap necrosis continues to be a significant problem in microvascular surgery. Despite improved microsurgical techniques and equipment, flap loss remains the major operative complication. Although ischemia-induced reperfusion injury remains a significant etiologic factor in flap loss, there is continued interest in endothelial mechanisms that regulate microvascular injury and thrombosis. In recent years, activated protein C (APC) has emerged as a promising therapy in counteracting microcirculatory injury. APC is an anticoagulant that is also involved in signaling pathways that modulate inflammation, apoptosis, and vascular permeability. This article presents the mechanism of action of APC and the benefits of this therapeutic agent, including a possible role in the prevention of free flap ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it