MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061270547 · doi:10.7202/1017368ar

Spiralités urbaines

2013· article· fr· W2061270547 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Caroline Lebrec

Bibliographic record

VenueArborescences Revue d études françaises · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPortraitArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abordant le sujet de la représentation de la ville contemporaine dans Plouk Town, Ian Monk dresse le portrait d’une vision urbaine du sale, du déchet, du rejet, à travers un portrait pluriel d'habitants humiliés et anonymisés. Cette étude montre ainsi comment le portrait de la ville imaginaire de la banlieue française s’inscrit à l'encontre du rayonnement culturel d'une francitude de carte postale, pour s'ancrer dans un réel suintant la violence et le dégoût. Le traitement des chiffres par la forme textuelle en spirale de la sextine apporte un éclairage intéressant sur la manière dont la ville contemporaine s’écrit sous forme de statistico-poésie pour dresser un inventaire de routines humiliantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArborescences Revue d études françaisesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207