MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061274013 · doi:10.1117/12.872914

Theory of plasmonic nanorod resonances

2010· article· en· W2061274013 on OpenAlexaff
Aftab Ahmed, Reuven Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanorodRodReflection (computer programming)OpticsPlasmonMaterials scienceWavelengthPhase (matter)OptoelectronicsResonatorIntegrating sphereLimitingPhysicsNanotechnologyComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface waves on cylindrical rods with dimensions much smaller than the incident radiation experience reflection from the ends of the rods thus effectively forming a cavity. Rods with flat ends and rounded ends have been studied in the past for determination of the phase of reflection, which plays a vital role in determining the resonant frequency. In this paper we present a simpler approach to evaluate the phase of reflection from rounded end rods by considering the limiting case of a sphere. We approximate the extreme sub-wavelength sphere by a Fabry Perot (FP) resonator to derive the relation for phase of reflection which will prove useful for the design of nanorods for various applications. Optical nanorods are extensively utilized in optical antennas, optical/biological sensors, light emitting devices and other optoelectronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207