MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Pile Reinforcement Effect to the Displacement of Geotechnical Materials in the Stratified Rock Slope

2011· article· en· W2061318471 on OpenAlexaff
Ke Ping Chen, Jinyuan Liu, Bing Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPileFinite element methodGeologyDisplacement (psychology)Deformation (meteorology)Stress (linguistics)Slope stability analysisSlope stabilityStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piles have been used in geotechnical engineering to stabilize slope for many years and the methodology has been accompanied by a significant bibliography. In the past, methods of analysis of pile-reinforced slopes have often used limit equilibrium methods, where rock–pile interaction was not properly considered. Recently, with rapid development of computer techniques, numerical methods using either finite element or finite difference methods have been widely applied in slope engineering, and have been shown to offer many advantages over limit equilibrium method, such as the ability to develop the critical failure surface automatically with fewer assumptions. However, seldom studies have been done on the stratified rock slope reinforced by piles, so in the present paper, the numerical simulation software FLAC3D is adopted to model the stratified rock slope, then the reinforced effect like deformation and stress of slope are studied, to give guidance for the real practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207