Reinterpretation of past sea-level variation of the Bay of Fundy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reports of shifts in rates of aggradation in a salt marsh deposit at Amherst Point, Nova Scotia have been linked with fluctuations in eustatic sea level, crustal subsidence and, possibly, changes in tidal amplitude. However, evidence for the most recent fluctuation is an artifact of early Acadian land reclamation that occurred in the seventeenth century at Amherst Point. Acadian settlers had constructed dikes to prevent regular tidal flooding, but probably allowed occasional flooding of the surface by tidal waters, thus maintaining the salt marsh signature of the deposit. Statistical analysis of the pollen assemblage from the uppermost deposit interpreted as a regressive sequence aligns critical depths with pollen assemblages retrieved from modern soils of diked and drained marshes. Inspection of historical aerial photographs confirms that the dikes persisted on the site until at least 1939. Interpretations of earlier fluctuations recorded in deposits below this regressive sequence remain valid. It is possible that the Bay of Fundy experienced a regressive period just prior to Acadian diking, but future research on unexamined salt marsh deposits here or elsewhere must include an exhaustive search of historical documents to avoid misinterpretation of anthropogenic modifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".