Density dependence in an experimental boreal forest understory community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density-dependent regulation in plants may occur at the level of the entire community and may differ in magnitude and direction at different life history stages such as germination, survival and growth, and under different abiotic conditions. We constructed semi-natural communities of boreal forest understory species planting 10 of the most abundant species. The experimental communities were established from seed or from cuttings and grown in sandboxes at six densities that extended far above and below average natural field density, while maintaining constant relative species proportions (a community density series (CDS)). We used two watering and fertilization levels in a factorial design. At the community level, both emergence and final per-plant shoot mass were negatively density dependent, while survival to the end of the season was facilitative. The effect of water was positive at seed emergence, whereas fertilizer negatively affected survival. Species-specific responses were also dependent on life stage. We demonstrated that density dependence is important in structuring this unproductive boreal understory habitat. The CDS approach allows us to quantify the effects of plant competition at the community and species levels, and to determine whether the importance of these biotic interactions depend on abiotic factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".