MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

More antigen-dependent CD4+ T cell / CD4+ T cell interactions are required for the primary generation of Th2 than of Th1 cells

2001· article· en· W2061368419 on OpenAlexaff
Nahed Ismail, Peter A. Bretscher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemBiologyAntigenImmunologyPhenotypeT cellAntigen-presenting cellAdjuvantSpleenCellCytotoxic T cellMolecular biologyCell biologyIn vitroGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanisms controlling the Th1 / Th2 phenotype of a primary immune response are often discussed assuming that the generation of Th1 and Th2 cells from the common CD4(+) precursor T helper (pTh) involves an interaction of this pTh cell with an antigen-presenting cell (APC) in the form of a two-cell interaction. Other studies suggest that the outcome of this two-cell interaction is modified by the presence of other T cells. No study has analyzed primary immune responses generated in normal, non-TcR transgenic mice, following the administration of a non-infectious antigen administered without adjuvant. We show that the Th1 / Th2 phenotype of such a primary response, generated in lethally irradiated recipients reconstituted with a variety of unprimed spleen cells, depends conjointly on the amount of antigen and number of unprimed syngeneic CD4(+) T cells present, with higher amounts and numbers favoring the generation of Th2 cells. Our observations show how these quantitative variables control in an interdependent manner the Th1 / Th2 phenotype of a primary immune response, and bear upon the mechanism by which this phenotype is determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207