Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rupture of thin water films (thickness of ∼100 μm) spreading radially outward on a solid surface was studied experimentally. Circular water films were produced by directing a 1 mm diameter water jet onto a flat horizontal plate for 10 ms. Jet impact velocity was varied from 1.6 to 6.1 m/s, giving Reynolds numbers from 1600 to 6100. Three different plates were used (glass, Plexiglas, and wax) to vary substrate wettability. Both rough and smooth wax surfaces were tested. Water films did not rupture on glass and Plexiglas plates, but holes formed and expanded in films spreading on wax, which had the highest liquid-solid contact angle. Tests in which the spreading film was not supported on a surface, but spread after impact on a pin to simulate a perfectly nonwetting surface, did not show formation of holes. A thermodynamic stability analysis predicted film rupture behavior by showing that films would be stable at very small or very large contact angle but unstable in between. Film rupture was also found to be promoted by increasing surface roughness or decreasing film thickness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it