MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061371873 · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00110.2002

Local, exendin-(9—39)-insensitive, site of action of GLP-1 in canine ileum

2002· article· en· W2061371873 on OpenAlexaff
E. E. Daniel, Mehran Anvari, J.E.T. Fox‐Threlkeld, Timothy J. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyPylorusIleumGastric emptyingAntrumStimulationAcetylcholineTonic (physiology)ReceptorChemistryStomachMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) modulates glucose levels following a meal, including by inhibition of gastric emptying and intestinal transport. Intra-arterial injection of GLP-1 into the gastric corpus, antrum, or pylorus of anesthetized dogs had no effect on the contractile activity of the resting or neurally activated stomach. GLP-1 injected intra-arterially inhibited intestinal segments when activated by enteric nerve stimulation but not by acetylcholine. Isolated ileum segments were perfused intra-arterially, instrumented with strain gauges to record circular muscle activity and with subserosal electrodes to stimulate enteric nerves. GLP-1 caused concentration-dependent inhibition of nerve-stimulated phasic but not tonic activity. This was absent during TTX-induced activity and partly prevented by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine. Exendin-(9-39), the GLP-1 antagonist, had no intrinsic activity and did not affect the actions of GLP-1. Capsaicin mimicked the effects of GLP-1 and may have reduced the effect of subsequent GLP-1. GLP-1 may mediate paracrine action on afferent nerves in the canine ileal mucosa using an unusual receptor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver PhysiologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207