MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061371903 · doi:10.1080/10236198.2010.549012

Some dynamical properties of Benford sequences

2011· article· en· W2061371903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Difference Equations and Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenford's lawMathematicsComplement (music)ConvexityDynamical systems theoryLogarithmPolynomialPure mathematicsExponential functionMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Numerical data generated by dynamical processes often obey Benford's law of logarithmic mantissa distributions. For non-autonomous difference equations this article presents necessary as well as sufficient conditions for to conform with Benford's law in its strongest form: The proportion of values in with base b mantissa less than t tends to as , for all integer bases . The assumptions on , viz. asymptotic convexity and eventual expansivity on average, are very mild and met, e.g. by practically all polynomial, rational and exponential maps and any combinations thereof. The results complement, extend and unify previous work. Keywords: Benford's lawBenford sequenceuniform distribution mod 1non-autonomous dynamical systemshadowingAMS Subject Classification:: 11K0637A4537B55

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it