MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061381424 · doi:10.1021/ja005612y

Metal Chelators Inhibit S-Nitrosation of Cysβ93 in Oxyhemoglobin

2001· article· en· W2061381424 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea A. Romeo, Angelo Filosa, John A. Capobianco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoulevardCitationChemistryLibrary scienceComputer scienceInformation retrievalNanotechnologyWorld Wide WebHistoryMaterials scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationNEXTMetal Chelators Inhibit S-Nitrosation of Cysβ93 in OxyhemoglobinAndrea A. Romeo, Angelo Filosa, John A. Capobianco, and Ann M. EnglishView Author Information Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Concordia University 1455 de Maisonneuve Boulevard West Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8 Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8, 1782–1783Publication Date (Web):January 31, 2001Publication History Received14 September 2000Revised4 December 2000Published online31 January 2001Published inissue 1 February 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja005612yhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja005612yrapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views236Altmetric-Citations29LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Bioinorganic chemistry,Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy,Mechanisms of action,Peptides and proteins,Thiols Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicHemoglobin structure and functionFrench-language works237,207