MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus in Children

2003· review· en· W2061387411 on OpenAlexaffabout
Merv Letts, Darin Davidson, Aboubaker Ahmer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteochondritis dissecansMedicineLesionMagnetic resonance imagingEtiologyPresentation (obstetrics)SurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the talus is rare in children. The lesion is encountered on either the medial or lateral surface of the talar dome. The etiology is unknown, although trauma has been implicated, particularly in lateral lesions. Since 1983, 24 children have been treated for OCD of the talus at a major Canadian pediatric referral center. Two children had bilateral involvement, for a total of 26 lesions. There were 10 boys and 14 girls. The average age at initial presentation was 13 years 4 months (range 6 years 7 months to 17 years 1 month). The lesion involved the medial aspect of the talus in 19, the lateral in 5, and the central talar dome in 3. Magnetic resonance imaging was very useful in preoperative assessment in six cases. Surgical intervention was required in 15 (58%) ankles. The results at the most recent follow-up revealed resolution or decreased symptoms in 25 (96%) and no change in 1 (4%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric OrthopaedicsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207