MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus in Children

2003· review· en· W2061387411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteochondritis dissecansMedicineLesionMagnetic resonance imagingEtiologyPresentation (obstetrics)SurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the talus is rare in children. The lesion is encountered on either the medial or lateral surface of the talar dome. The etiology is unknown, although trauma has been implicated, particularly in lateral lesions. Since 1983, 24 children have been treated for OCD of the talus at a major Canadian pediatric referral center. Two children had bilateral involvement, for a total of 26 lesions. There were 10 boys and 14 girls. The average age at initial presentation was 13 years 4 months (range 6 years 7 months to 17 years 1 month). The lesion involved the medial aspect of the talus in 19, the lateral in 5, and the central talar dome in 3. Magnetic resonance imaging was very useful in preoperative assessment in six cases. Surgical intervention was required in 15 (58%) ankles. The results at the most recent follow-up revealed resolution or decreased symptoms in 25 (96%) and no change in 1 (4%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it