MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061459447 · doi:10.1117/12.545790

Dispersion effects in fiber Bragg gratings based all-optical microwave filters

2004· article· en· W2061459447 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Zeng, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingOpticsApodizationMaterials scienceOptical filterDispersion (optics)MicrowaveFilter (signal processing)ReconfigurabilityBand-pass filterOptical fiberOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Different architectures for all-optical microwave filtering using fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) have been proposed in the last few years. Most of the research efforts have been focused on the basic structures and synthesis of wideband FBG-based all-optical microwave filters with possible reconfigurability and tunability, where all FBGs are assumed to have identical time delay for all the frequency components of the incident light. However, when the filter is proposed to work at very high frequency range, the dispersion effects induced by the FBGs have to be addressed. In this paper, a theoretical model is established to study the dispersion effects in the FBG-based all-optical microwave filter. Simulations and experiments are carried out. The results show that the effective coefficients of the filter are not constant, but a function of the modulating frequency, which will degrade the performance of the all-optical microwave filters and limit the highest operating frequency. To reduce the dispersion effects, we propose to use properly-apodized short FBGs with relatively flat reflection spectra and group delay responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207