VARIATION IN THE WING MORPHOLOGY OF WESTERN SANDPIPERS (CALIDRIS MAURI) IN RELATION TO SEX, AGE CLASS, AND ANNUAL CYCLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyzed differences in wing morphology between sexes and among age classes of Western Sandpipers (Calidris mauri) to assess possible relationships with differential migration, acrobatic aerial displays, and potential vulnerability to predation, using size-constrained component analysis. Data on wing morphology of all four sex and age classes were available from birds spending the nonbreeding season in northwestern Mexico, and data on females were available from throughout the annual cycle. During the nonbreeding season, females had longer and more pointed wings than males. Within each sex, adults had longer and more pointed wings than immature birds. Throughout the annual cycle, adult females tended to have longer and more pointed wings than immature females. The longer and more pointed wings of females are consistent with selection on flight efficiency for longer migration distances. The shorter and rounder wings of males are consistent with stronger selection for agility in flight during acrobatic aerial displays, but also with weaker selection for flight efficiency because of shorter migration distances. The rounder wings of immature birds are most consistent with stronger selection for take-off performance as an antipredator adaptation, at a cost of lower flight efficiency during long-distance migratory flight. Considering intraspecific sex and age class differences in wing morphology of species with differential migration complements interspecific comparisons assessing the relative importance of selective agents acting on this character. Variación en la Morfología del ala de Calidris mauri con Relación al Sexo, la Edad y el Ciclo Anual
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".