MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061518870 · doi:10.3917/gap.134.0547

Politique de défense et variétés du militarisme libéral

2014· article· fr· W2061518870 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Joana, Frédéric Mérand

Bibliographic record

VenueGouvernement et action publique · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDefense, Military, and Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les études consacrées aux transformations qu’ont connu les politiques de défense depuis une trentaine d’années dans les démocraties occidentales ont mis l’accent sur l’impact des facteurs technologiques ou stratégiques. Sans nier l’importance de ces facteurs, le propos de cet article est de souligner que ces évolutions découlent aussi de changements politiques et sociaux qui ont pesé sur la définition des enjeux de la politique de défense. Dans la plupart des pays développés les différentes composantes de ces politiques ont fait l’objet d’un double processus de libéralisation, économique et politico-culturelle, qui ont profondément modifié les significations qui leur sont attribuées. Les variétés du militarisme libéral qui en résultent contribuent à nuancer l’idée d’une convergence de ces politiques autour d’un modèle d’action publique unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGouvernement et action publiqueSame topicDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207