Chemical synthesis and structural studies of thiol-capped gold nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the chemical synthesis and structural studies of thiol-capped Au nanoparticles (NPs) using extended X-ray absorption fine structures (EXAFS) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Synthesis of Au NPs was conducted in one case in a toluene/water two-phase system using alkanethiols with varied hydrocarbon chain length (C6, C12, and C18), resulting in NPs of sizes ranging from 1.6 nm to 5.4 nm. Au L3-edge EXAFS reveals a systematical trend of the local structure of Au in the NPs when the Au/S ratio and chain-length of thiols are varied. In another synthesis, thiol-capped Au NPs were prepared on the surface of silicon nanowires, which act as both substrates and reducing agents. HRTEM reveals that not only spherical particles but also very small quasi-1D nanostructures of Au were formed. The formation and structure of these Au NPs was discussed in terms of ligand and template effect associated with the silicon nanowire substrates.Key words: thiol-capped Au nanoparticles, EXAFS, silicon nanowires, electroless deposition, quasi-1D Au nanostructures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".