Relay authentication by exploiting I/Q imbalance in amplify-and-forward system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although cooperative relaying has been widely utilized in wireless communications, it simultaneously introduces a new source of security vulnerabilities to the wireless networks such as denial of service attacks. In order to minimize the potential security risks from relays, reliable relay authentication schemes become necessitated. In this paper, a novel relay authentication scheme is proposed to secure amplify-and-forward relay systems through utilizing the device-dependent hardware imperfection in-phase/quadrature (I/Q) imbalance. In this scheme, the I/Q imbalance associated with the receiving and transmission of the relaying process is considered as a unique device fingerprint. This fingerprint is then utilized to develop a two-parameter hypothesis testing based authentication. To enhance the performance in differentiating delicate difference between I/Q imbalances, the generalized likelihood ratio test for classical linear model is used in our hypothesis decision algorithm. The performance of the proposed authentication scheme is assessed and validated by numerical simulations. The results show significantly enhanced authentication accuracy of our new method in comparison with other I/Q imbalance based hypothesis decision algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it