The 2‐day wave during the boreal summer of 1994
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2‐day wave during the boreal summer of 1994 was observed using stratospheric analyses from the British Met Office and at mesospheric heights using medium‐frequency (MF) radars and the microwave limb sounder (MLS) and high‐resolution Doppler imager (HRDI) satellite instruments. Most of the evidence from our study points to a high latitude source for the boreal 2‐day wave event we observed. We found little evidence for a connection between the 2‐day wave event in the mesosphere and activity at lower altitudes. Instead we contend that the 2‐day wave observed at upper mesospheric heights was excited in‐situ. This event was predominantly zonal wave number 2, was highly localized in time, and the disturbance propagated equatorially from high northern latitudes. At stratopause and lower mesospheric heights the largest 2‐day wave amplitudes were seen at high Southern Hemisphere latitudes (i.e., in the winter hemisphere). However, the austral winter 2‐day wave was trapped and did not penetrate to upper mesospheric heights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".