MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061540650 · doi:10.2514/1.j050379

Induced-Drag Minimization of Nonplanar Geometries Based on the Euler Equations

2010· article· en· W2061540650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMitacs
KeywordsDragEuler equationsMinificationEuler's formulaDrag coefficientMathematicsBackward Euler methodPhysicsMathematical analysisMechanicsClassical mechanicsGeometryMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The induced drag of several nonplanar configurations is minimized using an aerodynamic shape optimization algorithm based on the Euler equations. The algorithm is first validated using twist optimization to recover an elliptical lift distribution. Planform optimization reveals that an elliptical planform is not optimal when side-edge separation is present. Optimized winglet and box-wing geometries are found to have span efficiencies that agree well with lifting-line analysis, provided the bound constraints on the entire geometry are accounted for in the linear analyses. For the same spanwise and vertical bound constraints, a nonplanar split-tip geometry outperforms both the winglet and box-wing geometries, because it can more easily maximize the vertical extent at the tip. The performance of all the optimized geometries is verified using refined grids consisting of 88-152 million nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it