Et si le salut venait aussi du Sud « missionné » ? Itinéraire de L’Entraide missionnaire (1950-1983)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte analyse le parcours de L’Entraide missionnaire du point de vue de ses réseaux en portant une attention particulière à la manière dont ceux-ci s’internationalisent au cours des années 1960. Ce faisant, l’organisation établit et consolide des collaborations avec les théologiens et praticiens du Tiers-monde et du Québec, principalement issus des missions catholiques québécoises et de la coopération internationale. Dès 1968, L’Entraide opère un changement assez radical de vision du monde. Prenant dorénavant parti pour les plus pauvres, ce sont les idées-forces de la conscientisation, du dialogue, de l’inculturation et de la libération que l’organisation diffuse désormais auprès de centaines de Québécois engagés dans des luttes sociales et des groupes communautaires. Ainsi, L’Entraide donnera l’occasion à des Québécois de se familiariser avec des courants de pensée et de pratiques, mais aussi d’intégrer ces manières différentes de penser collectivement le monde contemporain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".