NMR Solution Structure of an Oligonucleotide Hairpin with a 2‘F-ANA/RNA Stem: Implications for RNase H Specificity toward DNA/RNA Hybrid Duplexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first structure of a 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-D-arabinose nucleic acid (2'F-ANA)/RNA duplex is presented. We report the structural characterization by NMR spectroscopy of a small hybrid hairpin, r(GGAC)d(TTCG)2'F-a(GTCC), containing a 2'F-ANA/RNA stem and a four-residue DNA loop. Complete (1)H, (13)C, (19)F, and (31)P resonance assignments, scalar coupling constants, and NOE constraints were obtained from homonuclear and heteronuclear 2D spectra. In the chimeric duplex, the RNA strand adopts a classic A-form structure having C3' endo sugar puckers. The 2'F-ANA strand is neither A-form nor B-form and contains O4' endo sugar puckers. This contrasts strongly with the dynamic sugar conformations previously observed in the DNA strands of DNA/RNA hybrid duplexes. Structural parameters for the duplex, such as minor groove width, x-displacement, and inclination, were intermediate between those of A-form and B-form duplexes and similar to those of DNA/RNA duplexes. These results rationalize the enhanced stability of 2'F-ANA/RNA duplexes and their ability to elicit RNase H activity. The results are relevant for the design of new antisense drugs based on sugar-modified nucleic acids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".